
In previous discussions, I mentioned my exploration of Large Language Model software, often referred to as “AI” but which I personally dub as “Massive Plagiarism Machines.” Specifically, I’ve been working with ChatGPT, inputting paragraphs from my story that lacked the desired impact and fell flat. To my surprise, the prose generated by ChatGPT proved quite interesting. While I made considerable edits, I found some of its suggestions to be beneficial. ChatGPT seems to have a penchant for excessively flowery writing, abundant with adverbs and redundant descriptions, but amidst the mediocre content, there are truly remarkable gems.
Today, I decided to give Google’s Bard, one of ChatGPT’s main rivals, a try. To my dismay, I was left very disappointed. I presented Bard with the same type of questions and requests I had been posing to ChatGPT, seeking assistance in refining paragraphs with improved grammar and description. Strangely enough, when asked to enhance a passage spanning around 900 words, Bard decided to condense it to a mere 200 words, devoid of any meaningful details or dialogue. It acknowledged that removing the “graphic” elements would be detrimental to the story, yet insisted on excising them regardless.
It appears that each platform has its own distinct applications. While I haven’t yet experimented with other platforms, I believe it would be worthwhile to do so. I find it surprising that Google’s offering completely disregarded my requests, even after numerous corrections were made.
I must emphasize that I do not intend for these tools to write my story on my behalf. However, engaging with them to exchange ideas has proven to be an intriguing exercise. Considering my inclination to create lackluster scenes, I view this experience as an opportunity to enhance my writing skills and strive for improvement.
Recent Comments